And the comparison with the A11 Bionic is just unfair. The devices that use it - the Xiaomi Mi 6, the Samsung Galaxy S8, and the Huawei P10, respectively - did a good job outpacing the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus in multicore scores, though they couldn't compete in single-core performance. The A11 is markedly faster than three biggest other smartphone chips: Qualcomm's latest Snapdragon, the 835 Samsung's Exynos 8895 and Huawei's proprietary Kirin 960. Moving to the seemingly more sensible comparisons with its Android peers, the A11 Bionic is, however, all the more impressive. Still, that we can put an iPhone in the same ballpark as a MacBook Pro (not even a standard MacBook) is a testament to Apple's engineering prowess and its optimisation work. This is also what happens when we consider the comparison with the MacBook Pro, which has a significantly larger screen that also contains many more pixels. This doesn't mean the latter two are less powerful devices, however - their larger, more-pixel-packed screens are meaningfully more demanding than the sub-HD screen inside the iPhone 8, so it's easier for the A11 to perform every test faster there. The iPhone 8 scored marginally better than the iPhone 8 Plus, which in turn beat the iPhone X. The A11 Bionic chip inside the iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, and iPhone X notably improved multicore scores, ranking higher than the 2017 13-inch MacBook Pro. Single-Core Score 1234 File Compression 1198 172.0 MB/sec Navigation 1398 8. Upload Date: 08:31 AM: Views: 3: System Information. Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders. Geekbench 6.0.3 for macOS AVX2 Result Information.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |